« What's Everyone Reading? (and I don't mean fu#*ing blogs) | Main | Not Even The Problem From Heck (Sorry, Kevin) »

December 11, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Corvus9

Mixed in the sense that it's based on a Jonathan Edwards sermon, not a Cotton Mather one?

Sir Charles

Pree-cisely.

Of course I could have played the song "Sunshine" and made it entirely consistent, but I like this one better.

Corvus9

And holy shit, that does sound like Revolver era Beatles. And only Revolver era Beatles. Why has no one else thought to go for that sounds before? It's awesome!

Sir Charles

Possibly for fear of being labeled "shamelessly derivative" -- but hey, if it sounds that good, I could live with that.

big bad wolf

but the later jonathan edwards doesn't really have a mersey beat.

musicians being shamelessly derivative is not always a bad thing for the listners. it may even, if you are the strokes, be good for the musicians. they are showing up awfully high in some decade recaps. that i don't quite get.

Sir Charles

bbw,

'tis hard to be a punning linguist.

The Strokes lost their charm for me pretty rapdily. Don't tell anyone, but they're kind of boring.

Corvus,

In terms of capturing the Beatles sound of this era, I will once again recommend Sam Phillips's "Martinis and Bikinis" with production assistance by her husband, T-Bone Burnett. Although one of our good blog friends assures me that T-Bopne is a bit of an asshole, his work on this record is pretty spectacular. And Sam's songwriting is superb.

The comments to this entry are closed.